Emily’s Solution to Zeno’s Paradoxe(s) 

      Arrow Paradox:

      An arrow in flight will never move because it will not be in motion at a
single moment in time, it will instead be frozen at that instance, and if it
is stationary at that instance it is stationary in every instance. 

      Point 1: 

       In his dichotomy paradox, Zeno stated that the distance between two
points in space is infinite, because it can always be divided in half. Thus
nothing moves as it is impossible to accomplish an infinity of tasks, and
there is infinite halves between two points. 

      Point 2:

      Using this argument, one could easily claim that there is also infinite
amount of moments between two points in time.  Infinities by nature can be
bigger than one another.  Then perhaps one can move through the other.     

      Solution 1:

      Furthermore infinity is always expanding, and since I occupy space and
time, I must be infinite.  Since it expands, then I too must be expanding.
Expansion can be a form of movement. 

      Solution 2:

      Infinity by nature is indefinable.  So if I occupy time and space, and I
am infinite then my place in them is undefined.  If I were stationary, in one
place and one time, this would be definable, violating the nature of infinity.  

      Point 4:

      Any massive matter is affected by time.  The more mass the slower the
flow of time. 

      Point 5:

      Speed also affects the flow of time.  Faster objects also slow the
passage of time.  This is stated in the Theory of Relativity. 

      Solution 3:

      For Earth’s time to flow at the rate it does it would have to be moving,
because it’s mass alone is not enough to slow time as much to make it run the
way it does.  (I still have to verify this mathematically, so I will keep you
updated as I figure it out.  However I’m pretty sure that it’s true, because
if it isn’t then both theories of relativities are wrong, and this is
unlikely.)